Eric’s finance HQ

More returns than a boomerang

Archive for January, 2008

French Bank Leader Implicated in 7.2 Billion Finance Fraud

Published by eric on January 28th, 2008 in Finance News

As you may have read over the past few days, Jerome Kiervel, a front trader agent employed by the Societe Generale (one of the biggest French Banks) is the only one implicated in the biggest finance fraud ever in Europe (7.2 Billion).

euros.jpg

Do you really think that only one man is responsible? Are you sure that Societe Generale management, led by its CEO, Daniel Bouton, didn’t have a clue about what was going on? According to the current economic situation, the Societe Generale has many advantages to consider. Here are the facts:

  • Jerome Kiervel was one of the formers inspectors of the entries posted into the trade market system (back-office). His position was changed to front trader agent by his management few years ago. This decision was of course very risky… History has of course shown this to be true with Nick Leeson at Barings Bank who, in 1994, dragged it to bankruptcy.
  • Societe Generale said it had learned of the fraud last weekend. But how can’t you notice a 7.2 billion fraud with massive holdings representing more than 60 billion??? No agent trader can work alone without being covered by back control agents or management board.
  • Last weekend… What a coincidence! Just before the subprime mortgages crisis! The bank was forced to sell the contracts just as stock markets were dropping. It took the bank three days to unload them. It was in the Societe Generale’s best interests to unhinge the market. After all, for several months, there were rumors in financial circles about a potential buyout from HSBC - which is now, effectively, a hostile takeover!

As an extra note, the bank had actually earned more than 1 billion last year thanks to the trader agent illegal positions. Nice! Read the mainstream news details of the current situation here.

The Oil Barrel Price

Published by eric on January 24th, 2008 in Finance News

gaz.jpg

 Auto and oil executives do what they can to keep the demand for oil high. With flowing oil comes flowing cash! Unfortunately for the consumer, the prices rise as well, as the source of that flowing cash. Did you know that the oil price per barrel has risen by 90$ from 1946 to 1997, and that we entered the New Year with an oil price record of 100$ a barrel?

When will it stop? Well, one thing’s for sure: the demand sure isn’t going anywhere. In 1900, there were 4000 cars in the United States. In 2002, the world had more than 531 million passenger cars. If fuel alternatives present themselves, maybe things could change, but as long as oil infrastructures are in place and there’s still oil in the ground, that won’t happen any time soon.

Here’s a 60-year look at the rising price of oil, by the barrel. Frightening!

1946-01-01

1.170

1975-01-01

11.160

1946-06-01

1.270

1975-06-01

11.160

1947-01-01

1.620

1976-01-01

11.160

1947-06-01

1.870

1976-06-01

12.170

1948-01-01

2.570

1977-01-01

13.900

1948-06-01

2.570

1977-06-01

13.900

1949-01-01

2.570

1978-01-01

14.850

1949-06-01

2.570

1978-06-01

14.850

1950-01-01

2.570

1979-01-01

14.850

1950-06-01

2.570

1979-06-01

19.100

1951-01-01

2.570

1980-01-01

32.500

1951-06-01

2.570

1980-06-01

39.500

1952-01-01

2.570

1981-01-01

38.000

1952-06-01

2.570

1981-06-01

36.000

1953-01-01

2.570

1982-01-01

33.850

1953-06-01

2.820

1982-06-01

35.070

1954-01-01

2.820

1983-01-01

31.190

1954-06-01

2.820

1983-06-01

31.000

1955-01-01

2.820

1984-01-01

29.690

1955-06-01

2.820

1984-06-01

29.967

1956-01-01

2.820

1985-01-01

25.641

1956-06-01

2.820

1985-06-01

27.143

1957-01-01

2.820

1986-01-01

22.945

1957-06-01

3.070

1986-06-01

13.469

1958-01-01

3.070

1987-01-01

18.656

1958-06-01

3.070

1987-06-01

20.034

1959-01-01

3.000

1988-01-01

17.160

1959-06-01

2.970

1988-06-01

16.530

1960-01-01

2.970

1989-01-01

17.983

1960-06-01

2.970

1989-06-01

20.005

1961-01-01

2.970

1990-01-01

22.641

1961-06-01

2.970

1990-06-01

16.871

1962-01-01

2.970

1991-01-01

24.959

1962-06-01

2.970

1991-06-01

20.195

1963-01-01

2.970

1992-01-01

18.820

1963-06-01

2.970

1992-06-01

22.375

1964-01-01

2.970

1993-01-01

19.075

1964-06-01

2.970

1993-06-01

19.070

1965-01-01

2.920

1994-01-01

15.000

1965-06-01

2.920

1994-06-01

19.070

1966-01-01

2.920

1995-01-01

17.990

1966-06-01

2.920

1995-06-01

18.420

1967-01-01

2.970

1996-01-01

18.880

1967-06-01

3.000

1996-06-01

20.450

1968-01-01

3.070

1997-01-01

25.170

1968-06-01

3.070

1997-06-01

19.170

1969-01-01

3.070

1998-01-01

16.710

1969-06-01

3.350

1998-06-01

13.660

1970-01-01

3.350

1999-01-01

12.470

1970-06-01

3.350

1999-06-01

17.890

1971-01-01

3.560

2000-01-01

27.180

1971-06-01

3.560

2000-06-01

31.830

1972-01-01

3.560

2001-01-01

29.580

1972-06-01

3.560

2001-06-01

27.600

1973-01-01

3.560

2002-01-01

19.670

1973-06-01

3.560

2002-06-01

25.520

1974-01-01

10.110

2003-01-01

32.940

1974-06-01

10.110

2003-06-01

30.720

   

2004-01-01

34.270

   

2004-06-01

38.020

   

2005-01-01

46.840

   

2005-06-01

56.260

   

2006-01-01

65.510

   

2006-06-01

70.960

   

2007-01-01

54.570

   

2007-06-01

67.480

       

The Recession

Published by eric on January 24th, 2008 in Finance News

money.jpgThis is maybe a sad topic to begin my blog with, but the recession can’t be neglected by finance enthusiasts like us. By global economic standards, a country is considered in a recession when its GDP declines for 2 or more consecutive quarters in a year. In the past, economists often had a poor forecasting record: several missed predicting the Great Depression in the 1930s. Are we witnessing a replay of the same situation? A 2001 survey indicated that 95% of American economists denied that the country was in recession (even though one had already started).

A recession obviously affects employment and investment, with the housing market hit critically. House prices fell 5% in the last year when the residential investment collapsed.

Can the rest of the world escape American economic trouble? It seems that the economies of Europe and Japan are slowing down. It may be surprising to say that the solution for global growth is to stay strong in emerging economies. Indeed, with economic reforms, their annual growth rate hit 7%. In 2007, they contributed half of the planet’s GDP growth. In the past, those emerging countries often needed the help from the big players, but it appears that this time they could be the rescuers.

An America in recession reduces other countries’ exports, but the emerging economies are less vulnerable than they used to be. Their home demand permits greater autonomy. The increase of consumer spending in China and India contributed more to international GDP growth than in America.

As far as the global economy’s concerned, for the moment, wait and see before any major investments.